Skip to content
Two biblical figures: Belteshazzar or Belshazzar

Two biblical figures: Belteshazzar or Belshazzar

Dr. Zachary Porcu

May 7, 20263 min read

The short answer:

Belteshazzar and Belshazzar were two different people: Belteshazzar was the name given to Daniel when he was a slave in Babylon, while Belshazzar was a king who reigned during Daniel’s time in exile.

There was no king “Belteshazzar” in the Bible, though you may be misled by the similarity of this name to “Belshazzar.” The latter was a king, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian empire, and some scholars believe that he was the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar II. Belteshazzar, on the other hand, was the name given to the prophet Daniel when he was taken as a captive in Babylon.

Why was Daniel given the name Belteshazzar?

Daniel was one of the most famous prophets of the Old Testament. He served under Nebuchadnezzar II, the king of Babylon, and was famously thrown into a den of lions as punishment for refusing to worship the king as a god. While a captive servant, Daniel was trained in the Babylonian court and given the name “Belteshazzar.” Getting a new name was common for captured or enslaved people. Daniel’s new owners were Babylonians, and “Daniel” was a Hebrew name, so it makes sense that they might want the convenience of referring to him with a name from their own language.

20260507_BritonRivère_DanielLionsDen

Briton Rivère - Daniel in the Lion's Den - 1872

Why did God punish King Belshazzar?

Belshazzar, on the other hand, was one of the last kings of Babylon. Chapter 5 of the Book of Daniel describes a grave mistake that that Belshazzar made during his reign. He held a feast and ordered that the gold and silver vessels which were originally in the temple in Jerusalem be brought out so he and his guests might drink out of them. The Babylonians had previously conquered the Israelites and destroyed the temple, looting the valuable cups and other vessels that the Israelites had used in their temple worship of God. After wars in the ancient world, it was common to take as spoils the religious objects of a conquered people. But Belshazzar’s actions had a further spiritual significance: he did more than drink out of those cups at the feast—he misused them in a religious way. As the Book of Daniel describes it,

“Then they brought the gold vessels that had been taken from the temple of the house of God which had been in Jerusalem; and the king and his lords, his wives, and his concubines drank from them. They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold and silver, bronze and iron, wood and stone.” (Daniel 5: 3-4)

What were the “gods of gold and silver, bronze and iron”? In the ancient world, there was an almost-universal art form of “making gods.” It was the practice of creating statues made of different materials (bronze, wood, stone, gold, et cetera) in the likeness of a particular deity and using magical arts to summon the deity’s spirit into the statue and trap it there—like a genie in a bottle. (Read more about the ancient practice of idol worship here.)

20260409 Bes-ImageOfHor-Asha-Khet

An Egyptian image of the god Hor-Asha-Khet, 4th–2nd century B.C.

Once the spirit was trapped in the idol, you could get it to do things for you by offering it different sacrifices. The implication in this passage from Daniel is that Belshazzar and his partygoers were celebrating alongside such statues of gods, statues that presumably had spirits trapped inside of them. Because everything ancient people did was understood to have spiritual significance, we can assume that the gathering had ritual significance and involved offering food and drink to these idols of gold and silver. In other words, the cups and vessels that had previously been dedicated to the religious service of the God of Israel were now being used in a ritual way to serve the “gods of the nations.”

What happened next? A hand appeared in the midst of the party and wrote something on the wall in front of everyone. No one could read the writing, so Daniel was summoned to interpret it. Daniel explained that the former king, Nebuchadnezzar, had been humbled by God and learned the lesson that, “the Most High God rules in the kingdom of men, and appoints over it whomever He chooses” (Daniel 5:21), but that Belshazzar, the current king, had not been humble:

“But you his son, Belshazzar, have not humbled your heart, although you knew all this. And you have lifted yourself up against the Lord of heaven. They have brought the vessels of His house before you, and you and your lords, your wives and your concubines, have drunk wine from them. And you have praised the gods of silver and gold, bronze and iron, wood and stone, which do not see or hear or know; and the God who holds your breath in His hand and owns all your ways, you have not glorified.” (Daniel 5:22-23)

Daniel interpreted the writing as declaring that Belshazzar had been weighed and found wanting, and that his kingdom would be divided up and given to the Medes and Persians. Sure enough, that very night, Belshazzar was slain and his kingdom was inherited by Darius the Mede (Daniel 5:31-32).

Image credit
  • Rembrandt - Belshazzar's Feast - 1630s
  • Briton Rivère - Daniel in the Lion's Den - 1872
  • Bes-image of the god Hor-Asha-Khet - The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Article folder: Old Testament

Tagged with: DanielidolatryBabylonIsraelitesSolomon's Templeslavery

Dr. Zachary Porcu

Zachary Porcu has a PhD in church history from the Catholic University of America in Washington DC, with additional degrees in philosophy, humanities, and Classics (Greek and Latin). He is an Eastern Orthodox Christian.

Full author bio

Keep reading

Who was Tartak in the Bible? The idol of the Avites

Who was Tartak in the Bible? The idol of the Avites

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
Tartak is mentioned in the second book of Kings (also called “4th Kingdoms” in older Bibles) as one of the idols that was set up in Samaria by the people who were living there. 2 Kings chapter 17 describes the religious confusi...
Pentagram vs Star of David: Symbolism Historical and Modern

Pentagram vs Star of David: Symbolism Historical and Modern

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
While modern people tend to associate the pentagram with the devil, satanism, or magic in general, it’s important to realize that the pentagram is a perennial symbol that’s been used in huge range of cultural contexts for all o...
Abdiel: Milton's Angel who Scorned the Devil - By a PhD

Abdiel: Milton's Angel who Scorned the Devil - By a PhD

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
The name “Abdiel” appears in the Bible only one time, in 1 Chronicles 5:15: “Ahi the son of Abdiel, the son of Guni, was chief of their father’s house” (NJKV). In this passage, Abdiel appears as someone’s father in a genealogy,...
What is the longest book in the Bible? And the shortest?

What is the longest book in the Bible? And the shortest?

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
Questions about which book of the Bible is the longest or the shortest are a little misleading because the answers depend entirely how you count. The first issue is that there isn’t a single canon of scripture. The older canon ...
"It is well with my soul": Bible verse or hymn lyric?

"It is well with my soul": Bible verse or hymn lyric?

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
The phrase “it is well with my soul” does not appear in the Bible as an exact quote. It was penned by a nineteenth-century Protestant named Horatio G. Spafford. The sentiment is not entirely un-Biblical, however, as you could a...
Emperor, Liberator: Who was Cyrus in the Bible?

Emperor, Liberator: Who was Cyrus in the Bible?

Dr. Zachary Porcu
by Dr. Zachary PorcuCatholic University of America
To understand the significance of Cyrus the Great, we need a little bit of context for the history of the ancient Israelites. If you know your Old Testament history, you know that there were two important time periods in the hi...